Difference between revisions of "Missteps of Devon"

From Shadow of the Throne Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Missteps of Devon ''By Unknown'' --------- Missteps of Devon is a philosophical text on the subject of sorcery, a critique of the [[Devonian School of Sorcery|Devonian S...")
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Missteps of Devon
 
 
 
 
''By Unknown''
 
''By Unknown''
  
Line 8: Line 5:
  
  
Missteps of Devon is a philosophical text on the subject of sorcery, a critique of the [[Devonian School of Sorcery|Devonian School]]. The critiques attack belief that sorcerous meaning is found in underlying laws of Creation, drawing evidence from disparate other theories and approaches to sorcery to show that each achieves the same results without adhering to the supposed ‘laws’ theorized by Devon. Instead, perhaps a sign the author was associated with the [[Silurian School of Sorcery]], it is proposed that sorcerous meaning is found in the interplay of symbols, whose relations and positions can explain sorcerous effects.
+
Missteps of Devon is a philosophical text on the subject of sorcery, a critique of the [[Devonian School]]. The critiques attack belief that sorcerous meaning is found in underlying laws of Creation, drawing evidence from disparate other theories and approaches to sorcery to show that each achieves the same results without adhering to the supposed ‘laws’ theorized by the sorcerous savant [[Devon]]. Instead, perhaps a sign the author was associated with the [[Silurian School]], it is proposed that sorcerous meaning is found in the interplay of symbols, whose relations and positions can explain sorcerous effects.
  
  
 
[[Category:Literature]] [[Category:Occult Texts]]
 
[[Category:Literature]] [[Category:Occult Texts]]

Latest revision as of 20:20, 26 September 2014

By Unknown




Missteps of Devon is a philosophical text on the subject of sorcery, a critique of the Devonian School. The critiques attack belief that sorcerous meaning is found in underlying laws of Creation, drawing evidence from disparate other theories and approaches to sorcery to show that each achieves the same results without adhering to the supposed ‘laws’ theorized by the sorcerous savant Devon. Instead, perhaps a sign the author was associated with the Silurian School, it is proposed that sorcerous meaning is found in the interplay of symbols, whose relations and positions can explain sorcerous effects.